Probably break-in changes. I had filters and such before I picked up the bike and did my first oil change the day I got it. I took a back road home and it went up and down the first 3 gears to help get the rings seated (i.e., lots of compression braking). Then I did another 40 miles with compression braking in the top 3 gears on the freeway and then changed the oil at ~83 total miles. A new filter was installed. Modern engines don't shed much stuff, but you do get a bit from the transmission.Can't see why they would change it from the CBR500r. That would complicate things for no reason.
Any reason why you're looking into those already?
Follow the Manual if you want your warranty to be honored.So I've seen many different break in rituals from many different people since joining this (and the other) forum...
What does the manual actually say to do, and what's the harm in simply following that?
They would have to prove that you didn't to deny a warranty claim.Follow the Manual if you want your warranty to be honored.
They don't have to "Prove" andything. They just have to say nah you didn't do it right.They would have to prove that you didn't to deny a warranty claim.
My personal thinking for these modern engines is to use them but dont abuse them during break-in. It has worked for me so far. Some suggest giving a bit of a thrashing but not too hard and for sure not for too long. They claim this helps everything seat in fully. I do like the idea of changing the oil a few times during break-in. It is cheap insurance! A guy on the Burgman forum who is an engineer says unless the engine is designed for full synthetic oil to not switch until the engine is well used, 5k miles or more. Can't remember his exact reasoning but it was based in science and not just an opinion.
That is what I used to think too BUT there is a law covering warranties{sometimes the government gets things right}. It is known as the Magnuson-Moss Act. One thing it does to protect consumers is that it requires the company who issued the warranty to prove that the consumer did not use the product correctly! Otherwise they would just say "you did something wrong" so they wouldn't have to fix it. Now you might have to take them to court but the law is on your side. It also works for aftermarket parts , they have to prove that said part caused an issue. So the thing you hear of "don't put this part on your bike because it will void your warranty" isn't totally true.They don't have to "Prove" andything. They just have to say nah you didn't do it right.
Those numbers match to the CB500f and CBR500.Parts are starting to dribble in. According to motosports.com these are the K&N #s as an exact-fit.
KN-204 Black
KN-204C Chrome
I am just going by owning other bikes and atvs and on their forums people are constantly told they did something wrong without any proof. It happens all the time.That is what I used to think too BUT there is a law covering warranties{sometimes the government gets things right}. It is known as the Magnuson-Moss Act. One thing it does to protect consumers is that it requires the company who issued the warranty to prove that the consumer did not use the product correctly! Otherwise they would just say "you did something wrong" so they wouldn't have to fix it. Now you might have to take them to court but the law is on your side. It also works for aftermarket parts , they have to prove that said part caused an issue. So the thing you hear of "don't put this part on your bike because it will void your warranty" isn't totally true.
In the past engines would end up with much more metal shavings in such when new. So people got use to changing oil several times, but it really isn't anywhere near that now. Even at the 600 mile mark when you do the change there will likely be almost nothing in the oil. I know some other bikes actually use to come with some crappy oil in them when new, so people would just get use to changing it once they got the bike so they could just keep using an oil they know.I wasn't questioning going beyond the manufacturer's requirements... it was more a question of why some choose to change their oil immediately... then again within a hundred miles or so... some having 3 or 4 oil changes by the time one is actually due.
Maybe myth, maybe not. I like to get to know my bike right away so the few $ and the little time invested in changing the oil is worth it to me. For sure it won't be hurting the bike and it will let me learn something.In the past engines would end up with much more metal shavings in such when new. So people got use to changing oil several times, but it really isn't anywhere near that now. Even at the 600 mile mark when you do the change there will likely be almost nothing in the oil. I know some other bikes actually use to come with some crappy oil in them when new, so people would just get use to changing it once they got the bike so they could just keep using an oil they know.But most of that is all just myth stuff now and people are use to doing things the way they did in the past or were told to do so by someone who did in the past.So its mainly out of past habbit.