Honda Rebel 300 & 500 Forum banner

1 - 20 of 35 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
1 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
So I would rather get a 300 just because it is cheaper and has better MPG (small fuel tank on the 500 is a bummer).

One important thing to me is going on the highway. I honestly don't need anything that can do above 75 for general use so I think the 300 should be able to handle that. I know the 300 would be a lot more strained at 70 than the 500. My question would be does the 300 use more fuel than the 500 at 70MPH? At that point I would just get the 500.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
527 Posts
I think they're pretty comparable.
I ride my 300 daily on the expressway, 25 miles each way.
I'm averaging about 70-75 mpg cruising between 70-80mph.

If money is an issue, you'll be fine with the 300. If you have money to spare go with the 500 for extra bit of power.
Either will serve your purpose.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
428 Posts
+1 for 500, it's not that much more (to some it is i understand) and you'll want some pep when you're about to get creamed corn by a semi, regardless though its your decision and you're getting better mpg than any car. good luck deciding!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
814 Posts
There are a ton of reasons to get a 500 and really only one reason to get the 300.(That being it is cheaper)

MPG should likely be within 5 mpg of each other.
While the 500 weighs 40lbs more, the bike is balanced so well you really would not see a difference.
The 500 is a very smooth engine. While both the 300 and 500 have had some users complain about vibration, there is a big difference. The 300 would have a lot more vibration being a single cylinder.
Braking: While they both have the same braking system, a lot of the review sites who have actually tested both the 300 and the 500 said the 500 has better stopping power. This is likely due to the weight of the 500 being better suited for the bikes braking system.
Power: First off neither bike is some crazy power house. But the 500 does have considerably better power than the 300. While you can easily ride the 300 on the highway the power you have at those higher speeds is not on par with the 500. And depending on your weight and if you plan on having a passenger this may cause some issues for you.


In the end, both bikes are great. But it just seems less likely you will have doubted your choice if you go with the 500. And a lot of people seem to get bored with some bikes, the 500 seems like a better choice long term.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
138 Posts
I totally love my 300 and for the riding I do, I don't regret it at all but highway is not that comfortable on the hands with how much vibration comes through the bars at that speed. Most of the highway riding I do is 25 minutes or less and unless my hands are weirdly sensitive, that's all they can really take before my right hand starts getting tingly and numbing.

I've found the vibrations don't really get super noticeable until about 62mph so I usually just cruise right around 60 for the sake of comfort. Especially since you say you want to be up to 75, I would recommend saving the extra bit and going with the 500.

Like others have said, either will do the job, but that's my 2 cents.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
15 Posts
There are a ton of reasons to get a 500 and really only one reason to get the 300.(That being it is cheaper)

MPG should likely be within 5 mpg of each other.
While the 500 weighs 40lbs more, the bike is balanced so well you really would not see a difference.
The 500 is a very smooth engine. While both the 300 and 500 have had some users complain about vibration, there is a big difference. The 300 would have a lot more vibration being a single cylinder.
Braking: While they both have the same braking system, a lot of the review sites who have actually tested both the 300 and the 500 said the 500 has better stopping power. This is likely due to the weight of the 500 being better suited for the bikes braking system.
Power: First off neither bike is some crazy power house. But the 500 does have considerably better power than the 300. While you can easily ride the 300 on the highway the power you have at those higher speeds is not on par with the 500. And depending on your weight and if you plan on having a passenger this may cause some issues for you.


In the end, both bikes are great. But it just seems less likely you will have doubted your choice if you go with the 500. And a lot of people seem to get bored with some bikes, the 500 seems like a better choice long term.

I think ease of maintenance is another fine reason to buy the 300. I could have easily purchased the 500 but after riding both and taking time to have a real close look at all the components of each, honestly I would not have bought the 500 if it had been LESS money. When it comes time to do any maintenance or repair, I am going to love all the room around the single to get in there.
I think the 300 has plenty of power for what it is (and I have owned many bikes with 4-5 times the hp), my wife and I are 290 lbs combined and it is enough.
People talk about vibration with the single but this is one of the smoothest bikes at 70 mph I have ever owned.
Maybe I am just crazy but I do see a long term benefit in one of everything vs two of everything, for a simple lightweight cruiser.


Also, if you have a shorter inseam, the 500 clutch cover really gets in the way with regards to right foot and leg placement. I found it extremely annoying.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
814 Posts
I think ease of maintenance is another fine reason to buy the 300. I could have easily purchased the 500 but after riding both and taking time to have a real close look at all the components of each, honestly I would not have bought the 500 if it had been LESS money. When it comes time to do any maintenance or repair, I am going to love all the room around the single to get in there.
I think the 300 has plenty of power for what it is (and I have owned many bikes with 4-5 times the hp), my wife and I are 290 lbs combined and it is enough.
People talk about vibration with the single but this is one of the smoothest bikes at 70 mph I have ever owned.
Maybe I am just crazy but I do see a long term benefit in one of everything vs two of everything, for a simple lightweight cruiser.


Also, if you have a shorter inseam, the 500 clutch cover really gets in the way with regards to right foot and leg placement. I found it extremely annoying.
I hate to even ask, but what other bikes have you owned if it is the smoothest bike at 70mph you have ever owned? I own the 500 but I have driven a coworkers 300 several times and outside of my fathers old Suzuki Savage it has the most vibration out of any bike I have ridden. Not saying it is bad enough to make the bike not rideable, but it is far far far from the smoothest bike.
I also don't see any part of the 500 where the maintenance looks very difficult.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
15 Posts
have owned, R6, ZX7, Buell S-1, multiple Harley big twins and sportsters, a Vrod, two Suzuki s40's, Cb360, kz200, tu250x, Kawasaki 454 ltd, z125 pro, Ducati 620 Monster and a bunch of cb125,175 and 350-4's. The R6 was smooth but with all your weight on your hands, what vibration there was, soaked right in.
Two smoothest at speed were the Buell and my Rebel, almost electric feeling.


I just like simple things, bit of a minimalist I suppose, and for example a valve adjustment would not even require removing the tank. four valves to adjust vs eight.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
814 Posts
have owned, R6, ZX7, Buell S-1, multiple Harley big twins and sportsters, a Vrod, two Suzuki s40's, Cb360, kz200, tu250x, Kawasaki 454 ltd, z125 pro, Ducati 620 Monster and a bunch of cb125,175 and 350-4's. The R6 was smooth but with all your weight on your hands, what vibration there was, soaked right in.
Two smoothest at speed were the Buell and my Rebel, almost electric feeling.


I just like simple things, bit of a minimalist I suppose, and for example a valve adjustment would not even require removing the tank. four valves to adjust vs eight.
There is definatly nothing wrong with the 300 it is a great bike. And being single cylinder would make it easy to work on.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
15 Posts
Another vote for the 300. I have both the CB300f and CB500f engines downstairs in my garage, I ride them all the time. I bought the rebel in the 300 size to add to my collection because of my experience with both these engines and I knew the 300 would be more fun in the urban / City environments I ride in. I get to do more with the 300 than the 500. I find the 500 engine smooth and because of that, u!timately kind of boring.

Test ride both then buy which ever bike you find more fun. Simple as that.

Nothing against the 500, I enjoy it, it's just that the 300 engine is more enjoyable for me. I've noticed here and there other more experienced riders purchase the Rebel 300 over the 500 for their own reasons. My reasoning, purely for the fun factor.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
15 Posts
Braking: While they both have the same braking system, a lot of the review sites who have actually tested both the 300 and the 500 said the 500 has better stopping power. This is likely due to the weight of the 500 being better suited for the bikes braking system.
My apologies but this would seem to be a load of fashionable poppycock. 0:)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
814 Posts
Braking: While they both have the same braking system, a lot of the review sites who have actually tested both the 300 and the 500 said the 500 has better stopping power. This is likely due to the weight of the 500 being better suited for the bikes braking system.
My apologies but this would seem to be a load of fashionable poppycock.
Its not from me, several sites that reviewed the bike have said it.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
15 Posts
Its not from me, several sites that reviewed the bike have said it.
Not several sites, you said a lot of sites... that tested both the 300 and 500.

Is a lot of sites more like one, maybe? Can you bring these sites to light? I for one would find that reading very entertaining, and telling.

Still... Poppycock!:wink2:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
167 Posts
Not several sites, you said a lot of sites... that tested both the 300 and 500.

Is a lot of sites more like one, maybe? Can you bring these sites to light? I for one would find that reading very entertaining, and telling.

Still... Poppycock!:wink2:
Hey Dave, is it really worth starting an argument about? Unfortunately I don't think your emojis are softening what you're actually saying. It's a matter of opinion, agree to disagree.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
814 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
15 Posts
Hey Dave, is it really worth starting an argument about? Unfortunately I don't think your emojis are softening what you're actually saying. It's a matter of opinion, agree to disagree.
My apologies Fletch but come on. It is not a matter of opinion. Do you want to see people just make stuff up and post it here like it's real? How does that help new riders making decisions?

Yes I might be calling BS here but I rather hoped my emojies would keep things light hearted. But sometimes things have to get straightened out. Take for instance this braking poppycock. Do you believe this?

The link offered says nothing to the effect of the quote. Here's all that was said about the brakes from that site:

"Like everything else other than the engine, the brakes are the same on both Rebels. With a single disc on each wheel, it doesn't look like a lot of stopping power, and the 500 has that extra bit of weight to slow down. But in reality I found that the brakes worked just fine on both bikes and were appropriate for the Rebel's mission."

Do ya see what I'm saying? And there's supposed to be "a lot" of sites saying "...the 500 has better stopping power."

We've only been offered a link to a single site (among what's supposed to be "lots")... And it's a lie! Sorry, I don't know how to convey this more kindly.

They never say anything remotely close to the 500 having better braking power than the 300 in the linked article. Why? Because the two bikes have the exact same braking system. Yes?

So frustrating. And again I'm so so sorry for any hurt feewings. But come on, let's call a spade a spade.:frown2:
 
1 - 20 of 35 Posts
Top